Headmin Rulings
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
Примечание: Эта страница модерируется и на неё могут ссылаться в OOC проблемах, например обжалованиях банов, жалобах, отзывах и т. п. Это не распространяется на страницы на которая она ссылается. |
This is a compilation of headmin rulings on various policy questions asked by players. This page does not replace the rules and whenever possible the rules should be referred to instead of this page. The rulings listed here can be referenced in ban appeals and admin complaints.
Please note: Some of these questions are for very niche/specific situations. Some of them cannot be applied the same way to every situation.
General Rulings
IC/OOC Rulings
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Раскрытие режима в IC | Это будет считаться OOC в IC, если сказано что-то в духе "это рева", но в тоже время, нет ничего плохого в "на станции революция". По сути, нужно раскрывать режим, сохраняя при этом сеттинг, словно вы участник раунда. | Jul 12, 2017 | PKPenguin321 |
Pile on ick ock (в грубом переводе "куча ик ока (иц ооц)" | Ситуация, когда толпа дразнит кого-то за IC в OOC разрешается, до тех пор, пока это не превращается в спам. Админы могут замутить OOC в целом или у некоторых, если допустимая черта была пересечена. | Sep 24, 2017 | Ausops |
IC реакция на IC в OOC | Разрешается пока не пересечена черта OOC в IC. | Sep 30, 2017 | Ausops |
Antagonist Rulings
Escalation Rulings
Security Rulings
Silicon and Drone Related Rulings
AI/Cyborg Rulings
Drone Rulings
Mostly defunct, as drones have since been removed, reworked, and re-introduced into the codebase.
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Drone Policy Guidelines | Guide to drone policy. | May 20, 2015 | Stickymayhem |
Are drones valid? | Only if they do something to annoy you. Mass killing drones for no reason is not okay. | Sep 14, 2017 | KorPhaeron |
Drones and permabrig | You can go in to fix damage. You might still get dronebanned if you let people out, it will likely be handled case-by-case. | Oct 17, 2016 | |
Drones and Powersinks | Drones cannot destroy powersinks under the same logic of them not being able to defuse bombs or stop plasma floods. | Aug 31, 2017 | Ausops |
Law Interpretation Rulings
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Law interpretation and do not state this law clauses | There is room for interpretation in some cases. Be consistent in your interpretation of the laws. | Aug 22, 2017 | Ausops |
Do AIs need a definition of Syndicate agent? | No, they know by default what a Syndicate agent is. This also applies to other antagonists. | Jun 23, 2014 | Hornygranny |
Do purged silicons have to act like a crewmember? | Purged silicons are subject to rule one and standard escalation. | Dec 22, 2014 | Stickymayhem |
Discussion on paladin lawset: Part 2, the electric boogaloo | Most relevant post is by HotelBravoLima, which applies to law interpretation in general. "Even doing something consistent with an interpretation of laws isn't good if you're being an OOC dick about it to such an extreme, that's the policy." | May 02, 2015 | HotelBravoLima |
Tyrant module discussion | Just general discussion on the tyrant lawset. | ||
AI's law zero | The law zero that a traitor AI gets means that it is an antagonist and it can ignore all other laws. | Oct 27, 2015 | KorPhaeron |
Are AI laws applied retroactively? | No. You'll have to read this thread to understand it, the question doesn't really provide enough context. | Apr 04, 2016 | Hornygranny |
If a borg linked to a rogue AI is emagged then does the emagged laws or AI law zero take priority? | Very niche case and is probably impossible since emags should sever the connection to the AI. Starmute made a good post on AI law priority if you are confused. | ||
Potential Law One Violations | "Prioritizing "potential future law violations" is a fucking terrible idea, since it makes silicons able to handwave basically any law two request with "yeah but if i let you in there you might potentially attack somebody inside, law 1 violation!!!"" | Jun 06, 2017 | PKPenguin321 |
Make "Do not state this law" a valid silicon policy law | No, for the variety of reasons that have been said in this thread. | Aug 25, 2019 | Wubli |
MRP Rulings
Archived Rulings
For Headmin Rulings that are no longer relevant, either due to being overruled or not applicable via code changes.